Social media activist VeryDarkMan has condemned the courtroom drama involving Barrister Marshall and Justice Crack, calling the entire incident “shameful” and attributing it to pride, ego, and malice. The controversy erupted when Barrister Marshall withdrew the bail application for Justice Crack during a court hearing, leading to the judge’s continued detention. VeryDarkMan expressed deep disappointment, noting that Marshall had been actively engaged in the case for days and had just returned from Turkey specifically to handle the matter. Despite repeated attempts to contact the lawyer, communication remained unresponsive before the court appearance, fueling speculation about mismanagement and personal conflicts.
In a viral statement, VeryDarkMan said, “Barrister Marshall withdrew his bail application for justice in open court today and for that reason, justice would no longer be released today. He just left Turkey yesterday just because of this case, he has been talking about it for days, called him but haven’t been able to reach him. All I can see here is pr!de, Ego and mal!ce from everybody that was in that court, all of them just went there to do make a mess of themselves. I am embarrassed on behalf everyone that claimed they went there for the release of justice, including Barrister Marshall and the whole thing is quite sh@meful.” His words sparked immediate backlash across social media platforms, with many Nigerians debating who was truly responsible for the failed bail process.
The incident has exposed deep divisions within Justice Crack’s legal team, raising questions about coordination, strategy, and accountability. Conflicting narratives have emerged, with some blaming VeryDarkMan for allegedly manipulating the situation, while others point to Marshall’s last-minute withdrawal as the primary cause. Online reactions have been intense, with users accusing the activist of being a “manipulator in chief” and using the case for personal gain. One X user, @maneekofficial, wrote, “Na VDM run am. This guy na evil guy, and Marshall has lost my respect for letting VDM use him like this.” Another, @Realjeks, added, “Manipulator in chief… Keep fooling your deluded followers who don’t reason on their own!”
Others questioned the authenticity of the events, suggesting the courtroom drama was pre-arranged. @Gent2soul123 commented, “You can tell from his body language that he’s fully aware what’s happening — everything has been arranged. I know manipulator when I see one.” Meanwhile, @CrazyArtifact01 mocked the situation, saying, “Very Daft Man collect award from army last week, he carry lawyer go turkey, lawyer come back withdraw case, baba ope.” The public’s frustration is evident, with @LutfyBee lamenting, “And una think say the government go take us serious…. Na wa oooo.”
Some users, like @ayomi_de21, argued that both parties may have contributed to the mess, stating, “Either VDM wan take the glory or not so who con dey suffer now no be justice crack? 2 people can be wrong at a time…. una suppose just allow Marshall to lead and release the man and your argument will be later.” The debate continues as Nigerians await further developments in Justice Crack’s case. The incident underscores the fragility of legal processes in high-profile cases and highlights the growing influence of social media figures in Nigeria’s public discourse. As the legal battle unfolds, the nation watches closely, hoping for clarity and justice.
Leave a Comment